This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jun. 13, 2000

OLD COMPLAINTS

The Adviser: Employment Law By Lisa Lawson After years of confusing guidance from the California Court of Appeal in regard to the "continuing violation" doctrine, one recent decision finally sheds light on what factors a plaintiff must show to invoke the doctrine and thereby skirt the one-year statute of limitation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Government Code Section 12960


        Employment Law
        By Lisa Lawson
        
        After years of confusing guidance from the California Court of Appeal in regard to the "continuing violation" doctrine, one recent decision finally sheds light on what factors a plaintiff must show to invoke the doct...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up