This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Antitrust & Trade Reg.

May 31, 2000

Remedial Ramifications

Practitioner: Antitrust Law By Ralph C. Hofer On April 3, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson entered the court's conclusions of law in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. Microsoft, 98-1232 (D. D.C., filed May 18, 1998). The conclusion that Microsoft violated state and federal antitrust laws was no surprise, given the damaging findings of fact Jackson had entered Nov. 5. There, the court accepted the government's contentions that Microsoft had engaged in widespread and continuous anti-competitive conduct.


        
        Antitrust Law
        By Ralph C. Hofer
        
        On April 3, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson entered the court's conclusions of law in the Microsoft antitrust case. United States v. Micr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up