This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 27, 2007

What Property-Rights Advocates Get Wrong About the Constitution

Forum Column - By Philip Seymour - Though pro-growth advocates usually consider themselves strict constructionists, their interpretation of the Takings Clause is a remarkable example of judicial activism.

FORUM COLUMN

By Philip Seymour

      In an Oct. 10 column, conservative commentator Ronald Zumbrun complained that California courts have not gone far enough in "Combating Takings." Zumbrun's wrath falls most heavily on the California Supreme Court's 1998 decision in Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal Commission, 17 Cal.4th 1006 (1998).
      Landgate holds that development delays cau...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up