This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 25, 2007

Eminent Injustice

Forum Column - By Richard Brent Reed - A lawsuit by the city of Riverside that prevented a challenge to local eminent-domain practices didn't just preserve an unjust policy; it denied citizens the right to challenge government injustice.

FORUM COLUMN

By Richard Brent Reed

      When Riverside resident Ken Stanbury attempted to put an anti-eminent domain initiative on the city's ballot in 2005, he wasn't the first citizen to attempt to reign in his government with a petition. Eight hundred years ago, King John (the usurper Prince John of Robin Hood fame) had the annoying habit of taking land from one baron (like Robin of Loxley) and giving it to a favorite (like Sir ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up