This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Jun. 12, 2015

Subpoena form places unintended burden on some

It is time to revise the mandatory court form used to issue subpoenas in state courts. As written, it is placing an unintended burden on parties issuing subpoenas for consumer and employee records. By Nathan J. Novak


By Nathan J. Novak


It is time to revise Form SUBP-010, the mandatory court form used to issue subpoenas
in California's state courts. As written, it is placing a burden unintended by the
Legislature on parties issuing subpoenas for consumer and employee records.


When a party issues a subpoena duces tecum for the production of the "personal records
... pertaining to a consumer&qu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up