This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Jun. 9, 2015

Judicial election reform begins with ballots

Seeing as judicial elections are likely here to stay, debate should focus on reforming the election system, not eliminating it. One place we can start is with ballot designations. By Randolph M. Hammock


By Randolph M. Hammock


Although reasonable minds differ over the appropriateness of judicial elections, the
simple fact is they appear to be here to stay: Voters are unlikely to eliminate one
of the few powers they have concerning our judicial system - the election of judges.
As such, the debate should focus on reforming our judicial election system, rather
than eliminating it. One place we can start is ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up