LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
Retired Judge Kathryne Ann Stoltz's otherwise fine article ("When a court learns of jury misconduct," May 26) has two errors: First, the article cites criminal cases as to whether and when a court can take evidence from jurors. The article does not say that, in civil cases, on a motion for new trial, a court cannot have jurors testify. Maple v. Cincinnati Inc., 163 Cal. App. 3d 387 (1985...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In