This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

May 30, 2015

When justices own a friend of the court

There are currently no laws on the books requiring Supreme Court justices to recuse themsleves from cases in which a company they own shares in submits an amicus brief. By Gabe Roth


By Gabe Roth


A relatively new feature of U.S. Supreme Court cases is that nearly all of them are
accompanied by amicus curiae, or "friend of the court," briefs that offer the nine
justices guidance on how to rule. Up until a few decades ago, these briefs appeared
in only about half the cases. This decade it's closer to 96 percent - and they're
highly influential, with briefs being cited...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up