This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

May 15, 2015

LETTER: Factors ignored in column on discrimination case

Timothy Rueben and Michael Hirota's recent guest column on Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District ignored several factors. By J. Bernard Alexander

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

In Timothy Rueben and Michael Hirota's recent guest column, "High court not looking good for employers" (May 13), the authors reach the erroneous conclusion that "[a]fter Williams [v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District], there is virtually no downside for a plaintiff to take a chance on a claim that is even a shred above meritless, meaning such employees and their lawyers have less ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up