This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jun. 24, 2011

Opinion Finds Facebook 'Friending’ a Represented Party to Be An Ethical Violation

Facebook "friending" a represented party held to be a violation of Rule of Professional Conduct 2-100. By Wendy L. Patrick of the San Diego district attorney's office


On June 21, the San Diego County Bar Association Legal Ethics Committee of which I have served as a chair for several years, released a bold new opinion on the potential ethical implications of Facebook friending a represented party. Opinion 2011-2, authored by former chair, Dan Eaton, states that friending a represented party violates California Rule of Professional Conduct 2-100. The opinion explains that a friend request is at least an indirect ex parte communication wi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up