This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jun. 23, 2011

Why Every Plaintiffs' Lawyer Should Fear the Common Law Release Rule

Settlements, which the court fails or refuses to find is entered into in good faith, can suffer nasty consequences under the release rule. By Daniel W. Ballesteros of Hoge Fenton Jones & Appel


By Daniel W. Ballesteros


A vestigial remnant of the days of contributory fault, the common law release rule presents a potentially catastrophic trap for the unwary. Before the enactment of Code of Civil Procedure Section 877 in 1957, California courts followed the common law rule that a release by one joint tortfeasor constituted a release of all joint tortfeasors. The purpose of the release rule was to avoid the potential for double recovery. The courts r...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up