Environmental
Jun. 22, 2011
A Case of Mistaken Identity?
Consensus that a 4th District case helps with greenhouse gas emissions analysis under CEQA is mistaken. By Michael P. Durkee and Thomas P. Tunny of Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
It is no great insight to say that the entire land use community is keenly focused on issues concerning the analysis of greenhouse gas emissions under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Even the tiniest morsels of new information are eagerly devoured. Take, for example, the recently published decision by Division One of the 4th District Court of Appeal in Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environment...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In