For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Aug. 12, 2000

Hearing Halt Is Insufficient Reason for New Trial

SAN FRANCISCO - Two defendants charged with capital murder should not get a new trial just because the judge presiding in their case interrupted their preliminary hearing by closing his courtroom for one day to attend a Judicial Council conference, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

By Peter Blumberg
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Two defendants charged with capital murder should not get a new trial just because the judge presiding in their case interrupted their preliminary hearing by closing his courtroom for one day to attend a Judicial Council conference, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
  &...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Year in Review Column, Civil Litigation

California courts continue to circumscribe anti-SLAPP motions

Dec. 7, 2023
By Douglas L. Johnson, Daniel B. Lifschitz


By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.