This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Jul. 11, 2007

Untangling Restrictions

Focus Column - By Cecily T. Talbert and Joshua Safran - Developers looking to fight back against government land-use restrictions should pay attention to a new ruling that determines how and when they may do so.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Cecily T. Talbert and Joshua Safran

      A California Court of Appeal recently shed light on the murky interface between the Subdivision Map Act and the Mitigation Fee Act in Fogarty v. City of Chico, 148 Cal.App.4th 537 (Cal. App. 3rd Dist. March 12, 2007), clarifying what is and what is not a governmental "exaction." In Fogarty, the 3rd District dismissed a suit brought under the Mitigation Fee Act ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up