This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jun. 29, 2007

Arbitration Evolution

Dispute resolution outside of the court system is beginning to share traits with litigation.

Lawrence Waddington

Neutral, JAMS

Email: waddington1@aol.com

Lawrence is a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge and former assistant attorney general for the state of California. He is author of "Disorder in the Court" at Amazon.com. He also edits the 9th Circuit blog, "The 9th Circuit Watch."

Originally conceived as an alternative to litigation, arbitration focused on providing an efficient and expeditious resolution of commercial contracts. When the Supreme Court expanded the scope of arbitrable claims to include federal statutory rights as evidenced by Title VII employment cases and other non-negotiated contracts, the role of arbitration evolved to include volatile and personal relationships. Federal and state courts increasingly confronted challenges to arbitration clauses...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)