This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Perspective

Jun. 28, 2014

Could offensive trademarks find refuge in common law?

Even if a registration is cancelled, the underlying common law rights continue in the geography where the mark is used and known. By Sally M. Abel and Christine K. Au-Yeung


By Sally M. Abel and Christine K. Au-Yeung


The 177-page tome the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) just issued in Blackhorse v. Pro-Football Inc. this month is remarkable for its length and its subject matter, cancellation of the controversial REDSKINS mark as disparaging to Native Americans, though this isn't the first time the TTAB has crossed that controversial threshold.


The decision underscores a little known fundamental of U.S. t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up