This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Jun. 27, 2014

Judges can't accept small gifts from parties, ethics panel declares

Even "de minimus" gifts from litigants are forbidden, a Supreme Court judicial ethics committee says in a draft opinion clarifying a common worry. And judges should treat all gifts from lawyers with suspicion.


By Don J. DeBenedictis


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Clarifying the rules about a common worry for judges, a judicial ethics committee has declared that judges shouldn't accept even small gifts from litigants who have appeared in their court or who may appear in the future.


"Even gifts of nominal value ... are subject to the canons that govern gifts," the state Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions wrote in a draft opinion released ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up