This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jun. 11, 2014

Who should define 'intellectual disability'?

One could easily draw the conclusion that Justice Samuel Alito believes the judiciary is far better suited than psychiatrists and psychologists to diagnose the mental disorder known as intellectual disability. By Nancy Haydt


By Nancy Haydt


From his dissent in Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ___ (No. 12-10882, May 27, 2014) one could easily draw the conclusion that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito believes that the judiciary is far better suited than psychiatrists and psychologists to diagnose the mental disorder known as intellectual disability.


In 2002, the Atkins v. Florida decision, 536 U.S. 304, announced that murderers with intellectual disability are pr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up