Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Jun. 10, 2014
Name plaintiff in 'no-poach' case lays out objection to $324.5 million settlement
The settlement "may provide comfort that further antitrust violations can be settled for a fraction of their value, even in the face of compelling evidence of liability and damages," lawyers for the objecting class representative wrote.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A name plaintiff in the highly watched employment antitrust class action against four of Silicon Valley's largest companies has formally filed an opposition to the $324.5 million settlement the companies reached with plaintiffs' counsel.
The settlement represents too small a fraction of the potential damages in the case and "may provide comfort that further antitrust violations can be s...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In