This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jun. 6, 2014

State high court seems split on Domino’s liability

Justices question whether company should face claims for franchisee's actions


By Henry Meier


Daily Journal Staff Writer


LOS ANGELES - Justices of the state Supreme Court appeared divided Wednesday during arguments in a hotly contested case over whether a company can be held liable for the actions of its franchise owners.


Six high court justices - joined by 2nd District Court of Appeal Justice Victoria G. Chaney, sitting by designation - lobbed a slew of questions at both the appellant and respondent's counsel over ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up