Corporate
Oct. 8, 2002
Prevailing Cartwright Act Defendant May Not Recover Its Attorney Fees
Focus Column - By Mitchell S. Shapiro - The allocation of attorney fees in antitrust cases is of considerable interest to the franchise practitioner. Actions against franchisers for price fixing, exclusive dealing, illegal tie-ins and other antitrust abuses are common. Indeed, it was antitrust class actions such as Siegel v. Chicken Delight, 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), that, to a great degree, gave impetus to franchising as a specialty area of practice.
By Mitchell S. Shapiro
The allocation of attorney fees in antitrust cases is of considerable interest to the franchise practitioner. Actions against franchisers for price fixing, exclusi...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In