This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Sep. 12, 2009

The Royalty Treatment

The Federal Circuit recently found that under some circumstances, awarding an ongoing royalty for patent infringement in lieu of an injunction may be appropriate, write Mark Selwyn and Christine Duh.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Mark Selwyn and Christine Duh

Plaintiffs in patent infringement actions typically seek remedies in the form of monetary damages and injunctive relief. Until just a few years ago, a successful plaintiff would routinely be awarded monetary damages by the jury for infringement leading up to the judgment, and then granted a permanent injunction by the court to stop infringement following the judgment. The landscape changed dramatically...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up