By Lawrence Hurley
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on ethical impropriety in state judicial elections could cast its shadow over a major campaign finance case that the court will re-hear next month. Ethics groups embraced a ruling last term requiring state judges to recuse themselves in cases involving significant campaign donors, and they're now hoping it will give the justices pause before they consid...
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on ethical impropriety in state judicial elections could cast its shadow over a major campaign finance case that the court will re-hear next month. Ethics groups embraced a ruling last term requiring state judges to recuse themselves in cases involving significant campaign donors, and they're now hoping it will give the justices pause before they consid...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In