U.S. Supreme Court,
Letters,
Constitutional Law
Sep. 22, 2016
How many wrongs make a right?
Professor Erwin Chemerinsky's commentary on McDonnell v. United States, 2016 DJDAR 6444 (June 27, 2016) has thought-provoking implications about the source and substance of Supreme Court jurisprudence.




Thomas J. Weiss
Law Offices of Thomas J. WeissPhone: (818) 290-3810
Email: tweiss@weisszaman.com
Harvard Univ Law School; Cambridge MA
Professor Erwin Chemerinsky's commentary on McDonnell v. United States, 2016 DJDAR 6444 (June 27, 2016) has thought-provoking implications about the source and substance of Supreme Court jurisprudence. ["8 wrongs don't make a right," Sept. 19].
Chemerinsky's contention that the 8-0 decision of the court was "wrong" is "not even wrong." Not only does the analysis fail to appreciate the wisdom in the decision, but it fails to recognize le...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In