This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Feb. 24, 2012

A new rhetorical angle in marriage equality cases

In overturning Proposition 8, the 9th Circuit focuses on the societal meaning, rather than the legal effects, of marriage. By Jeremiah A. Ho of Washburn University School of Law


By Jeremiah A. Ho


While the mixed impact of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' Perry v. Brown, decision is still being debated, one thing about Perry is certain: In overturning Proposition 8, the 9th Circuit's opinion has elucidated what marriage means for same-sex couples more clearly than previous important marriage equality opinions. 2012 DJDAR 1705 What is particularly striking is how, within its legal reasoning, Perry boldly...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up