This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 15, 2012

Pivotal new ruling on management of class actions

The 1st District addresses the use of representative sampling and restrictions on trial testimony. By Barbara Cotter of Cook Brown LLP


By Barbara Cotter


In a case that may dramatically affect wage and hour class action litigation in California, the 1st District Court of Appeal ruled last week that a $15 million judgment against U.S. Bank cannot stand because the trial court's case management plan was unconstitutional. The case, Duran v. U.S. Bank National Association, arose from plaintiffs' claim that the bank wrongfully classified certain bank officers as exempt, thereby failing ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up