Intellectual Property
Jul. 30, 1999
College Try
^^Intellectual Property^^ College Try No State Liability for Patent Infringement and False Advertising The decisions have wide-reaching implications for the states, particularly state universities seeking access to information in the technology industry.
By John Giust and Ray Hartman
In Chew v. California, 893 F.2d 331 (Fed. Cir. 1990), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the patent laws failed to contain the requisite statement of congressional intent to abrogate state sovereign immunity from patent-infringement suits. In response, Congress...
In Chew v. California, 893 F.2d 331 (Fed. Cir. 1990), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the patent laws failed to contain the requisite statement of congressional intent to abrogate state sovereign immunity from patent-infringement suits. In response, Congress...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In