This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jan. 15, 2011

Arbitration on Trial

Arbitration continues to face challenges as an alternative to litigation.

Lawrence Waddington

Neutral, JAMS

Email: waddington1@aol.com

Lawrence is a retired Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge and former assistant attorney general for the state of California. He is author of "Disorder in the Court" at Amazon.com. He also edits the 9th Circuit blog, "The 9th Circuit Watch."

Challenges to arbitration have historically focused on the language of the arbitration clause, its existence, scope of coverage, and enforcement of its provisions. Yet the U.S. Supreme Court and California courts continue to endorse arbitration as a viable alternative to litigation. Although the courts in 2010 continued to resolve conventional objections to arbitration, the parties have also shifted their interest to collateral issues of this format for dispute resolution.

During...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)