This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 6, 2011

Litter Bug Gets Swatted by DNA Evidence

To what extent should DNA evidence be used against a defendant? By Richard La Fianza and Frank Loo of the San Bernardino public defender's office.


By Richard La Fianza and Frank Loo


About 30 years ago, DNA evidence was hailed as the great advancement in criminal science. With its help, the police could solve old cases and punish those who, in any other time, would have "gotten away with it." Through DNA, other claimed, those wrongfully committed would finally be set free.


The "Innocence Project" would establish both of those claims. This organization would test the DNA of conv...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up