This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jan. 4, 2011

The Debate Over Arbitral Finality

The review of arbitration awards by trial courts poses potentially serious consequences to our overtaxed system. By Frank J. Coughlin.


By Frank J. Coughlin


In 1992, Chief Justice Malcolm M. Lucas wrote that "an arbitration decision is final and conclusive because the parties have agreed that it be so." Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, 3 Cal.4th 1 (1992). A compelling case can be made that an arbitration award is final because Code of Civil Procedure Section 1286.2 - which is essentially unchanged from its 1927 predecessor, and materially the same as the original provision enacted...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up