This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Mar. 28, 2009

Words Matter

In upholding voters' unfettered power to enact discriminatory measures like Proposition 8, the Supreme Court may go further and trivialize the right to equality it so powerfully affirmed.

FORUM COLUMN

By Jackie Goldberg

Last May, the California Supreme Court's powerful and eloquent In re Marriage Cases decision explained in ways no previous court had why restricting the familiar, esteemed title and status of marriage to heterosexual couples - and relegating lesbian and gay couples to the obviously inferior status of domestic partnership - is inherently unequal and demeaning. Even as the proud author of the domestic partner statute ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up