This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Mar. 27, 2009

Statute's Misinterpretation Has Led to a Chill on Petition Rights

The objective of protecting the private citizen petitioning the governing body for redress of grievances has been gradually turned on its head.

FORUM COLUMN

By Steven J. Andre

In 1992, the California Legislature enacted Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. The anti-SLAPP statute gave new protection to the grassroots community organizer who spoke out before her or his governing body, when faced with a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) from a peeved developer or other well-heeled interest group. This objective of protecting the private citizen petitioning the governi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up