This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Mar. 18, 2009

Supreme Court Case Highlights the Hypocrisy of Judicial Ethics

It's time judges stopped wringing their hands about the ethical sleaze of judicial elections and adopt rules to take money out of the selection process.

FORUM COLUMN

By Peter Scheer

In America, a judge ordinarily may not take a "gift" of money from a person or company appearing before him in a legal case. Such a brazen assault on judicial independence is plainly unethical and potentially criminal.

Suppose, however, we alter the facts slightly so that the money is offered as a contribution to the judge's re-election campaign. A nonlawyer would say, wisely, that that is a distinction without...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up