By Lawrence Hurley
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - For a lawyer arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court, there's nothing worse than facing Justice Anthony Kennedy's steely glare. If you alienate Kennedy, the current swing vote on the court, there's a good chance you'll lose the case altogether. That's what seemed to be happening to Washington-based advocate David C. Frederick last October when he represented plaintiffs in a key case ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer WASHINGTON - For a lawyer arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court, there's nothing worse than facing Justice Anthony Kennedy's steely glare. If you alienate Kennedy, the current swing vote on the court, there's a good chance you'll lose the case altogether. That's what seemed to be happening to Washington-based advocate David C. Frederick last October when he represented plaintiffs in a key case ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In