Labor/Employment
Nov. 26, 2011
Some employers wary of arbitration clauses
The prediction that corporations would rush to add class-limiting language to employment agreements in the wake of a Supreme Court decision hasn't been true for all employers.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
When the U.S. Supreme Court held in April that companies could use arbitration clauses to limit class actions in consumer cases, some employment lawyers predicted clients would rush to add class-limiting language to employment agreements. But many management attorneys say employers have been slow to embrace the court's decision.
Part of the reason is practical: No one is certain if AT&T v....
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In