This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Real Estate/Development

Nov. 24, 2011

Developers watching cases over homeowner contracts

For years, developers have tried to dodge the high cost of construction defect trials through alternative dispute provisions. But that could all change.


By Sean Windle


Daily Journal Staff Writer


LOS ANGELES - For years, real estate developers have tried to dodge the high cost of construction defect trials by inserting alternative dispute provisions, such as arbitration requirements, into a development's governing documents. But that could all change following a recent appellate court decision and a case up for review by the state Supreme Court.


Governing, or founding, documents typically ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up