This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Nov. 10, 2011

High court weighs warantless use of GPS

In what could be a bellwether case for privacy protections in the digital age, the U.S. Supreme Court wrestled Tuesday with whether police need a warrant to track a suspect with a GPS device.


By Robert Iafolla


Daily Journal Staff Writer


WASHINGTON - In what could be a bellwether case for privacy protections in the digital age, the U.S. Supreme Court wrestled Tuesday with whether police need a warrant to track a suspect with a GPS device.


A majority of the justices appeared disturbed by the intrusive power of GPS trackers and other emerging technology, with some referencing nightmare scenarios of Big Brother-style surveillance. Yet ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up