This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jan. 4, 2017

2016 gender pay law made splash, but application still unclear

California's Fair Pay Act, implemented a year ago, has triggered a modest increase in gender pay discrimination complaints and two complementing laws. Its most important effect has been uncertainty about how courts and regulators will interpret what "substantially similar" means.

By Matthew Blake
Daily Journal Staff Writer

California's Fair Pay Act, perhaps the most ambitious state gender pay equity law in the nation, just celebrated its one-year anniversary, and employment lawyers remain confused as to how it will be applied.

The law, implemented Jan. 1, 2016, got national attention, because it changed California's gender pay equity standard from "equal pay for equal work," to "substantially similar" work betw...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up