FOCUS COLUMN
By Gary A. Watt
This article appears on Page 7.
For those following the continuing evidentiary dilemma posed by Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank, 218 Cal.App.3d 1410 (1990), last year was a very curious year. Biljac, like the beast in some late-night horror flick, was ostensibly killed but may not be dead. What Biljac's apparent demise means for lawyers trying to preserve their ev...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In