Immigration
Jul. 6, 2012
Court diverged on immigration this term
Even as the U.S. Supreme Court mostly backed federal primacy and executive discretion over immigration enforcement this term, the justices repeatedly second-guessed how a top administrative board interpreted immigration laws.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
WASHINGTON - Even as the U.S. Supreme Court mostly backed federal primacy and executive discretion over immigration enforcement this term, the justices repeatedly second-guessed how a top administrative board interpreted immigration laws.
The high court reviewed four rulings by the Board of Immigration Appeals, a group within the U.S. Department of Justice known as the BIA that hears challenges to d...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In