This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jun. 30, 2012

Justices punt on important damages question in consumer case

Declining to rule on an important consumer rights question, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed an appeal, leaving undecided whether a private right of action to enforce statutes exists without actual damages.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Declining to rule on an important consumer rights question, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed without explanation an appeal by a Santa Ana title insurer, the target of a potential class action by customers who claimed they were victimized by a illicit kickback scheme.


Although the high court had granted review, the case had been fully briefed by the parties and dozens of amici and the justic...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up