Perspective
Jun. 29, 2012
Fancy arguments won’t avoid conflicts with Concepcion
No matter how you spin it, SB 491 and Concepcion do not fit together. By Kim Stone of the Civil Justice Association of America
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
Brian Kabateck and Scott Malzahn overlook the benefits of arbitration and ignore the inherent conflict between SB 491 and the U.S. Supreme Court's Concepcion ruling in their op-ed "SB 491: Protecting Consumers' Right to Join Together" (June 25, 2012). Arbitration is a fair, efficient, cost-effective method of resolving disputes. With our court budgets facing even worse cuts, there is no reason to reduce the use of arb...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In