This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 28, 2012

Willful patent infringement after Bard v. Gore

The Federal Circuit has held that the first part of the Seagate test should be decided by the trial judge as a matter of law. By J. David Evered of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP


By J. David Evered


Infringement of a valid U.S. patent is a strict liability offense. What that means is that the finder of fact (usually a jury) need not be concerned with the accused infringer's state of mind or intentions - all that is required for a product to infringe a patent claim is for each limitation of the claim to be satisfied by the accused product.


However, courts have long been able to take account of the circumstances in which a pat...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up