This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Intellectual Property

Jun. 22, 2012

Ruling could make proving willfullness harder in infringement cases

Large monetary damages in patent lawsuits may be harder to get after an appeals court ruling directed judges - not juries - to decide a key question of whether infringement is willful.


By Craig Anderson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Large monetary damages in patent lawsuits may be harder to get after an appeals court ruling directed judges - not juries - to decide a key question of whether infringement is willful.


A U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit panel last week vacated a $371 million ruling in a medical device case, sending the case back to the trial court to determine whether it properly decided that W.L. Gore ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up