This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Aug. 16, 2006

High Court Must Exercise Discretion in Reviewing States' Capital Cases

Forum Column - By Michael Halley - The Supreme Court's decisions about which cases it accepts to review are crucial for the administration of justice nationwide.

Forum Column

By Michael Halley



The Supreme Court's decisions about which cases it accepts to review are crucial for the administration of justice nationwide. Yet these decisions are generally made without opinion, so little can be known about the underlying rationales in a given case or as matter of policy.
      In a series of recent cases, Justice John Paul Stevens has shed some light on this closed p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up