Letter to the Editor
Mel Gibson's colleagues have come to his defense with the explanation that it is his addiction which accounts for his wrongdoing. How novel. Any criminal defense attorney representing the unknown poor can tell you that no one believes that argument: it's the criminal's fault for being addicted in the first place. Apparently, the success of this reasoning depends on the celebrity and income of the transgressor.
...
Mel Gibson's colleagues have come to his defense with the explanation that it is his addiction which accounts for his wrongdoing. How novel. Any criminal defense attorney representing the unknown poor can tell you that no one believes that argument: it's the criminal's fault for being addicted in the first place. Apparently, the success of this reasoning depends on the celebrity and income of the transgressor.
...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In