This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 16, 2010

Today, Religion Looms Larger In Judicial Selections

Nomi Stolzenberg of USC Law School says the belief that religion has ceased to be a relevant factor in judicial appointments is not only inaccurate, but also dangerous.

By Nomi Maya Stolzenberg

According to recent press coverage of the upcoming retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, the last remaining Protestant on the Supreme Court, religion has ceased to be a relevant factor in judicial appointments. As a scholar of law and religion, I beg to differ.

Far from having receded as an influence, religion today looms larger in judicial selections - and opinions - than when Justice Stevens was appointed in 19...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up