This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 15, 2010

Inconsistent Rules Challenge State Water Regulation

Roderick Walston of Best Best & Krieger examines the incongruent rules governing states' rights to regulate different kinds of water projects.

By Roderick E. Walston

In a significant decision affecting California's right to regulate water, the California Court of Appeal recently held that federal law preempts California law as applied to regulation of hydroelectric power projects. The court, in its March 30 decision in Karuk Tribe v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 427, followed U.S. Supreme Court precedents holding that state laws applicable to hydropower projec...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up