By Nadav Ravid
On March 18, 2010, the California Supreme Court issued one of its most significant rulings in recent years impacting commercial real estate transactions. The Court reversed the holding in Steiner v. Thexton, which previously held that a contract giving a buyer the right to terminate for any reason in its sole discretion was an unenforceable option agreement that lacked consideration.
In 2003, Martin Steiner entered into...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In