This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Perspective

Apr. 7, 2010

No Threat to FEHA Fees

Contrary to what many employers' counsel predict, Chavez v. City of Los Angeles is likely to have a limited impact on attorney fee awards, writes Lisa Jaskol of Public Counsel.

By Lisa Jaskol

Despite predictions by some employers' counsel that the California Supreme Court's decision in Chavez v. City of Los Angeles (S162313, Jan. 14, 2010) will sharply limit attorney fee awards to prevailing plaintiffs in employment discrimination cases, the decision is far less sweeping than counsel might hope. Indeed, Chavez preserves the essence of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and its attorney fee provision.

Firs...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up